What Are Muscat Raisins

a surviving

the poet cries out for the thinkers behind the right, even to have a say

My foot is
abuts a brick
And the pain of my
Opens Eyes
The mirror is broken
big, small, thousands
splinters on the empty space
Where was he

breaks to each safety light
And barely reached my eye
Where my world
was only a few fragments
A light beam
reflected by here to there
Its origin
hardly identify

His hand
stroked the mirror fragments
A cut, a next
A drop of blood, a second
A thin red line
Draws its network
between the glass

Trek 2.1 Wsd Vs Specialized

! to survive

on the fifth and last part of this small series. only a very small piece, guys! (Kettcar)

As promised, I will try to show why we talk about making the gospel outside of the discourse must take place, or - as it signifies another major school of thought - 5 as

domination-free communication

we saw yesterday, that there is a clear communication logos adopted an eternal, as it were a god outside, above or behind the Logos incarnate, that Jesus can not give. the incarnation seriously, the talk is always blurry, ambiguous and, above all biased by the fact remain its own character sets. to the same object to speak, it requires constant mutual deconstruction and, based on the search for intersections in the deconstructed character sets., with the aim of arriving at mutual understanding, not to do through the back door talking uniquely.

this mode of conversation is appropriate because he reality of the possibilities of human communication into account and not on the illusion of uniqueness is based. where a claim is to be made or uniqueness that is inappropriate conversation. because then the conversation is no longer benefited from its integrated object, but only from a certain arbitrary character set, which is claimed uniqueness. what object then here is the conversation, is a tool with a human, namely, the language created image. it is not entirely independent of the object, but not identical to it. precisely this illusion of identity is produced but where claims uniqueness and thus the mutual deconstruction is stopped.

the Bible calls the generation of the illusion of unique human character of products of "idolatry". even if it involves optical and acoustic character is, and Isaiah, the book described in 44.15 to 18 in the language of his time is very impressive: The [Wood] gives people firewood, of which he takes and warms himself, nor he fires it and bakes bread; But from this he makes a god and worships it; he makes an idol of it and kneels before nieder.16 Half of it burns in the fire, he roasts meat on her and eats the meat and saturated, warm up well, saying: Ah ! I am warm, I feel the fire. 17 But the other half he makes to God that it was his idol, before which he kneels and fall down and pray, saying, Deliver me, for you are my God! 18 you know nothing and understand nothing, for they are blinded from seeing their eyes, And their hearts can not.

here is clear: the illusion of the identity of character and generates object "blindness", ie an assessment of the reality that this is inappropriate. realistic assessment of the possible is to have adequate, but the interest of every man, only she will allow him to lead a successful life, ie to take decisions on the basis of proper assessment of their circumstances and find the intended target was the result. (Who has ears, let him hear what series of my favorite schools of thought-here provides part. At all is this a happy eclecticism of different mind-tradition, which is I still break the argumentative neck)

this is precisely the need to talk that communication about the Gospel, to make free of domination, that is, the exercise of power by avoiding, whenever possible. for the exercise of power in communication is one thing above all: to impose my own set of signs to explain clearly and for a time, this alleged uniqueness and recognize themselves only to use these marks. So to force the other, an illusion to decay. follows from the above that, ultimately means to take him the possibility of a happy life by the knowledge of the impossibility of uniqueness replaced by the illusion of an existing uniqueness. But when exactly to have this opportunity the interest of every person and thus all the talk is concerned, it is also in the interest of all, no exercise is exercising to tolerate.

but why should that makes exercise, now without it? actually he should be happy and it makes no occasion to see, give it to him. but the enforcement of their own making with the help of sign also binds the men in power to the illusion. by the fact of mutual deconstruction, which extracts only a possible reality of adequate communication. that is, that he by the exercise of his own best interest makes acting contrary. the boundaries of his own as he sets itself can not break through, the possibility of the opening from the outside but not allow, he remains a prisoner is not adequate communication and is thus doomed to make decisions that can not contribute to a life be succeeding.

all this, the last five components of support are fundamental to me, andis polemical call with the fullest conviction. and so this series should now see an end.

some of your stuff but I observed and taken seriously: This is an attempt to think, publicly, in part, in areas in which I am familiar little. It is not a "Henni-of-states-now-you-by-just-the-world". I do not even pretend that my thoughts are least stringent in full. Finally, no clear object Henni open up a talk, but his characters take stock of your deconstruction's feet and hope that one or the other intersection might be. so fresh to the factory and take everything apart. I'm looking forward honest.

thinks ahead and! because just within my traditional, theological discourse immensely missing many topoi that are only touched on here or wrongly do not, what does all this mean, if it is true because, for the concept of revelation and hermeneutics? how can we understand salvation? Which view of eschatology as overcoming the circumstances of creation requires it? wonder what is it with spiritual gifts and the like from? and, finally, how do we go beyond the theory and design our practice of piety according to our conviction that, if it has become since our conviction?

Hair Roots Lighter Than Rest Of Hair

hang on to survive

today it should be about how to communicate the gospel happens after the physical presence of the person of Jesus was found on the earth to an end. the fact of the ascension does not mean that the incarnational principle, that is the communication of the Gospel under the conditions of creation finds its end.

after first Cor 12.27 constituted the total number of those who believe in Christ, the Body of Christ, so his ascension presence within the creation, after. So it must be about how the body communicates the gospel of Christ.

is in a traditional medium of communication

4th that preaches

we are all familiar with this word and connect to an impromptu lecture on a religious theme frame in an event that also explicitly religious theme is dedicated.

the acute envers, which carries this statement is Rom 10:17 : comes So faith by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ. What here word is translated "preach" is the Greek akoe. and puts in this much more: the root is Akuo , that is "listening". what is meant here is a word that is spoken by a particular person and one from another and understood. occurs, however, the acoustics, if you will, here in the background. So let's say, more generally, it is about reaching understanding through language between several people.

and here we are all arrived without forced back under When considering the communication of evamgeliums the conditions of the postmodern, for one, if not the foundation of postmodern thought-world is the confrontation with sign language and the possibility of mutual understanding. and here the problems begin, if one as a result of thoughtless flow can be called, then, that the means of communication sign language can never be a clear communication.

in the ontology, it is assumed that each language names to be called a clear sign that regardless of the sign in a field of transzendeten ideas - or however you put it - exists. rejects this idea as Derrida. can illustrate it like this: Each character can be described in other character sets through a series each of which in turn can be described by different sets. never you come to a sign which completely erläuterungslos directly refers to a transcendent idea. In addition, the set that is selected for further explaination, which will depend on the context of, and from the perspective of a specific tradition, so also are character and the set does not necessarily linked to its description fixed. that is, a little more simply: no clear word describes a thing.

a consistently understood Derrida, if I have understood him as doubtful, even if there anything we can talk about whether or not we just endure one another in endless chains of referential signs. but then communication is ultimately meaningless.

the thought of the incarnation, however, requires that the about what we are communicating well. incarnation means, finally, that something that is completely outside the creation, reveals within them. we just have to say we can not talk about it clearly, but only within the means of communication that just the impossible, so blurred, so to speak. Paul had already noticed and the pronounced now we see through a glass darkly but then face to face. Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am known said in first Cor 13:12 .

means that we are talking about is there but it is not present in the world. it exists only in vague talk about it. how can we then agree together and with other at all about the gospel? my opinion through communication, through conversation. reflects our character as we used to explain our own respective sets of characters and explain this again and again ... this but not with the goal to make endless strings and thus to lead the communications ad absurdum, but with the target to intersection form. to find the sets, which overlap and thus explain the fine character. in progress of such a part of communication will increase the average volume and the togetherness of communication has the potential to grow.

prerequisite for such communication is aufzutun but to understand the will and intersections for the sake of understanding. that could be a possible definition of "believe" are. Faith is a relationship-based conceptual and as such, like any relationship to communication: to understand the will, and to be understood. and a positive, loving relationship as well as the sake, not understanding the intention of the drain, even if it does not cease. the community of believers is therefore a group of people, in common to talk greater understanding and greater strives to be understood. and can only achieve this together. one understand the mind through which we conduct the interview: the gospel and the person with which it is inseparably one.

this communication has the goal, others in the conversation to take in and intersections of the character sets to make with them. in the language of Canaan, also known as a "mission" or "evangelism". as in any conversation here is the occurrence of such intersections and thus the understanding and the will to understand more for both sides involved in the conversation unavailable, that is not technically feasible. which is the next part once immensely be important. Longer versions of how this form intersections of to people who are first out of the conversation might look like and how it has done also the first community, I have already described under the somewhat posigen title guerrilla tactics , even if I where the latter had not yet served terminology.

as one can assume that during the conversation, not the subsets of the actual object completely wegverlagern of the conversation and the object is a completely any other? believe only the determination of a relationship that is constituted by two sides, just by us and by the incarnate. if this also in a positive, love-relationship is to us, we are also the will to advance understanding and to advance understanding with him. He takes part in the talks and meet us in it. So even if the object is and will be participants in the call, can not remove the object from his talk.

the need to blur and forced them through education to reduce signs of intersection is not undermined by it. for, as we have seen and have demonstrated through the life of Jesus is also subject to the self-communication of evageliums regulate the conditions and notification within each creation.

ui, that was a hard part. I am aware that linguistic form over sub-adequate is ... in German, the part is easy to read hard to clean. I think I already at a node eingearebeitet into the brain. I also hope that the grade andi is dirty finger on philosophical presentations. hau in, I ask.

tomorrow I will think about it then remains, why this talk outside the discourse of power needs. not only because we are obliged to follow the example of Jesus, but because in this view, the need for abstinence-bearing exercises.

headache, good night.

Where To Stream Sean Cody For Free

pause

the series makes a small break on Sunday and are all involved brains a little time to aerate ...

Vba Was Fast Now Slow Pokemon

film still

I'm back for part three of the series great. part one and two, who would have thought, is found directly underneath ...

yesterday we have been thinking about how the gospel in the person of Jesus in this world communicates and found that it is limited to the possibilities that are all humans have. However, we are still very still at large. so today is about the practical art of communication and the opportunities that are available to him Jesus also really exhausting, and in particular what not!

so it is now about what the main part of post andis accounts: the discourse of power. This part necessarily has a very strong narrative and less argumentative character. because this is not about the conceptual foundations of the communication of the Gospel, but whose actual realization, as we see the description of the life of Jesus in the Gospels.

third discourse makes

the statement of the last episode, was that the reaction, which can expect the Gospel is none other than the one can expect any human utterance: the other, they listen to, understand and accept as their own conviction and in best align its fall act on it. there are opportunities in this world, these processes, we say, encouraged. and makes it through the exercise of power.

which can contain much: know rhetorically sophisticated talk, supported by a head start on. to use communication medium, such as in our time of access to mass media. always plays into it also makes financial. the ability to determine the contents of education. political power that certain opinions punishable by law, or other supports from the state. emotional power that the binding of other people using a self to certain utterances to emphasize. and of course physical violence. this list could be extended in length, as does has myriad faces of and is omnipresent. we are all implicated in numerous aspects in them.

the incarnate gospel, Jesus, could take all these possibilities in challenging without the incarnation, the revelation in the circumstances of creation, so that demolition would be done. but he does not do it! he does not own this, of divine supervision, limited options, which give emphasis to his message. Jesus takes no part in the discourse of power, he does not share it. he is from the beginning and unto the end of his life in a position that he not participate in the discourse allows.

already the beginning of his life with this train in itself. already his conviction, which appears to us as a miraculous process impossible, to him in the eyes of his contemporaries, ever take a senior position in society: he is an illegitimate child, yes, it is even unclear who his father is, he could be a bastard . to marry as Joseph and Mary, the bride already pregnant.

also the place of his birth, the place is by Christmas, at which the incarnation is done pretty much the lowest, what one can imagine for a baby: in a crib in a stall, a sense of the word in every place of crappy. Nobody wants to be born on such a site or give birth to God and it is this place looks off to come into this world. Jesus is proclaimed as the king of angels and the baby gets it, that would even feel the lumpen proletariat as not tolerable.

work in his, he also refrained from any exercise of human power. first of Political Life makes. seems to us quite naturally, but was so clear, because on the floor of the promise of the Messiah in the Old Testament - for example Isa 11.1-5 - many expected a Messiah, the King of Israel as another and especially the Romans would become independent. So a political ruler. like Jesus distanced very clear when he says, for example the Jn 18:36 : My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would fight, so that I would not be delivered to the Jews: but now my kingdom is not of this world.

but there are also promises in the Old Testament that show much more accurately what the man Jesus really was: He shot in front of him as a tender plant and as a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty and majesty. We saw him, but there was no beauty that we should desire him. 3 He was despised and Allerverachtetste, full of pain and illness. He was so despised that it hid our faces from him, and we did not esteem Him. Isa 52.2-3 exactly so was Jesus as human: miserable. and respect is just a manifestation of the discourse makes the. also renounced Jesus.

he refused to talk to rhetorical ground, the man had carried away and argument could convince. He did not try again to convince, but said, deliberately in riddles and parables. he says it in Mk 4.10-12 : And when he was alone, asked him who were about him with the twelve, according to the parables. 11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is the secret of the kingdom of God given, but where it all happens out there in parables, 12 so they can see it with open eyes and not perceive, and listen with hearing ears and still not understand, so they repent not, and will forgive them. a clear disregard by the intellectual or rhetorical power of human exercise.

and finally he is a failed human being. which for us means the redemption, the death on the cross, was historically considered a regrettable failure. a rebel who has not yet done it, the riot at all to start the first dies, the most miserable and most undignified death which could have imagined that time. naked and bleeding, he was tortured on the cross. and the first known caricature in the same breath even ridiculed, the INRI sign. is he Mt 27.42 asked in mocking his intentions to flex, so he refuses again to the last.

there are still many incidents from the Gospels to show that Jesus never had the opportunities which he had commanded among the people, has used, but always and consistently humbled, humiliated and - like Andy said - was meager.

a story but there are who could be brought against this interpretation of the life of Jesus in position, and should prevail since honesty, I will not hide: the cleansing of the temple in Mt 21.12 to 13. Here you actually see the application of power, namely physical violence, through Jesus. added. However, it is the making of a crazy, slammed by the rampage in the temple. and use of power, which remained completely ineffective and inefficient. or does anyone seriously believe that the non-dealer the next morning all of them back to their original circumstances were?

so much material in a concise form in this part. tomorrow we approach the consequences that all this has for us, who live under the conditions of the postmodern. namely, if we ask how the Gospel, the Logos, in the proclamation of the community and thus our incarnated. and as the incarnate Logos in Jesus, of which he is never to separate, can match. I hope you will keep still and stay tuned!