today it should be about how to communicate the gospel happens after the physical presence of the person of Jesus was found on the earth to an end. the fact of the ascension does not mean that the incarnational principle, that is the communication of the Gospel under the conditions of creation finds its end.
after first Cor 12.27 constituted the total number of those who believe in Christ, the Body of Christ, so his ascension presence within the creation, after. So it must be about how the body communicates the gospel of Christ.
is in a traditional medium of communication
4th that preaches
we are all familiar with this word and connect to an impromptu lecture on a religious theme frame in an event that also explicitly religious theme is dedicated.
the acute envers, which carries this statement is Rom 10:17 : comes So faith by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ. What here word is translated "preach" is the Greek akoe. and puts in this much more: the root is Akuo , that is "listening". what is meant here is a word that is spoken by a particular person and one from another and understood. occurs, however, the acoustics, if you will, here in the background. So let's say, more generally, it is about reaching understanding through language between several people.
and here we are all arrived without forced back under When considering the communication of evamgeliums the conditions of the postmodern, for one, if not the foundation of postmodern thought-world is the confrontation with sign language and the possibility of mutual understanding. and here the problems begin, if one as a result of thoughtless flow can be called, then, that the means of communication sign language can never be a clear communication.
in the ontology, it is assumed that each language names to be called a clear sign that regardless of the sign in a field of transzendeten ideas - or however you put it - exists. rejects this idea as Derrida. can illustrate it like this: Each character can be described in other character sets through a series each of which in turn can be described by different sets. never you come to a sign which completely erläuterungslos directly refers to a transcendent idea. In addition, the set that is selected for further explaination, which will depend on the context of, and from the perspective of a specific tradition, so also are character and the set does not necessarily linked to its description fixed. that is, a little more simply: no clear word describes a thing.
a consistently understood Derrida, if I have understood him as doubtful, even if there anything we can talk about whether or not we just endure one another in endless chains of referential signs. but then communication is ultimately meaningless.
the thought of the incarnation, however, requires that the about what we are communicating well. incarnation means, finally, that something that is completely outside the creation, reveals within them. we just have to say we can not talk about it clearly, but only within the means of communication that just the impossible, so blurred, so to speak. Paul had already noticed and the pronounced now we see through a glass darkly but then face to face. Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am known said in first Cor 13:12 .
means that we are talking about is there but it is not present in the world. it exists only in vague talk about it. how can we then agree together and with other at all about the gospel? my opinion through communication, through conversation. reflects our character as we used to explain our own respective sets of characters and explain this again and again ... this but not with the goal to make endless strings and thus to lead the communications ad absurdum, but with the target to intersection form. to find the sets, which overlap and thus explain the fine character. in progress of such a part of communication will increase the average volume and the togetherness of communication has the potential to grow.
prerequisite for such communication is aufzutun but to understand the will and intersections for the sake of understanding. that could be a possible definition of "believe" are. Faith is a relationship-based conceptual and as such, like any relationship to communication: to understand the will, and to be understood. and a positive, loving relationship as well as the sake, not understanding the intention of the drain, even if it does not cease. the community of believers is therefore a group of people, in common to talk greater understanding and greater strives to be understood. and can only achieve this together. one understand the mind through which we conduct the interview: the gospel and the person with which it is inseparably one.
this communication has the goal, others in the conversation to take in and intersections of the character sets to make with them. in the language of Canaan, also known as a "mission" or "evangelism". as in any conversation here is the occurrence of such intersections and thus the understanding and the will to understand more for both sides involved in the conversation unavailable, that is not technically feasible. which is the next part once immensely be important. Longer versions of how this form intersections of to people who are first out of the conversation might look like and how it has done also the first community, I have already described under the somewhat posigen title guerrilla tactics , even if I where the latter had not yet served terminology.
as one can assume that during the conversation, not the subsets of the actual object completely wegverlagern of the conversation and the object is a completely any other? believe only the determination of a relationship that is constituted by two sides, just by us and by the incarnate. if this also in a positive, love-relationship is to us, we are also the will to advance understanding and to advance understanding with him. He takes part in the talks and meet us in it. So even if the object is and will be participants in the call, can not remove the object from his talk.
the need to blur and forced them through education to reduce signs of intersection is not undermined by it. for, as we have seen and have demonstrated through the life of Jesus is also subject to the self-communication of evageliums regulate the conditions and notification within each creation.
ui, that was a hard part. I am aware that linguistic form over sub-adequate is ... in German, the part is easy to read hard to clean. I think I already at a node eingearebeitet into the brain. I also hope that the grade andi is dirty finger on philosophical presentations. hau in, I ask.
tomorrow I will think about it then remains, why this talk outside the discourse of power needs. not only because we are obliged to follow the example of Jesus, but because in this view, the need for abstinence-bearing exercises.
headache, good night.
0 comments:
Post a Comment