Attach Folder To Email

jack and rose

Jack, so she called him, Jack! "Do not call me that," he said, "Please do not call me that." "How shall I call you because otherwise," she asked back in surprise.

"How many times ... how many times have you called that name before others?" "Already thousands of times, but for how else?" "And if this was so, whom do you have listed there so ... Rose? Who do you have so called? The Jack, whom I think that Jack, the Jack you think or someone else, we were not even have come to know? " "..."

"And who thought the fact that that name belongs? One of them? A Jack, will you introduce to them the same now? Or that he is an Other? Tell me whom you call by that name if you so call?"

"How shall I call for, then?" "If you want to call me, then do not call me by name!"

Ativan Morphine Hospice

preach it, judas!

Judas, the old traitor. He was the one who betrayed Jesus, who delivers it to the magistrates, he led the dramatic events of Good Friday, but also a easter. against blood-money he's henchmen to Jesus so they could take him prisoner and executed.

yes, Judas betrayed Jesus. he did so in every sense of the word: he betrayed him, his relationship and his friendship with him. He gave him a cruel treatment and death from. he betrayed Jesus to trust in him and his love for him.

but he also betrayed the world out there, who is Jesus, he took his secret to the public, he revealed the essence of Jesus as Messiah to the people. He told them who the Son of God. where Peter denied everything, was Judas to Jesus, with whom he had spent three years. and he made public, who this Jesus is. the sign under which it happened, nothing to change this first.

and we do something different when we preach? we betray Jesus. we betray his message to those who are . Listen we know his secret and the treasure that is there to find him. But we betrayed him in the second sense, and we deliver it from. Not only that, we bind him with our own words, in our own language and give him so from the crowd. they can take it from us and hunt through their thoughts, their doubts and torture him to death with their fears.

one is not to have one without the other, not as long as we preach with human language to human ears. and yet we can not stop to speak of him and betray him. he has gone he goes in there, how God from the very beginning in the human language. He faces up to the betrayal. and so it was also Jesus, Judas set out on his way to say:

Now is the Son of Man glorified, and God is glorified in him. Jn 13.31 b

Pain In Thumb And Between Pointer Finger

fine hundi

Andi has thrown me a stick, which I of course like to nachhechele ... I was therefore applied the following: take the side closest to you located the directory with more than 123, it beat on this same page 123 and quote the fifth and the following three principles ...

because of my desk from just about all my books are in the same range, I've taken the liberty to choose the one that I spontaneously fell into the eye. The following rates are So here as wood become Presents

And by the first-mentioned distinction to respect the right (justified in God's own action) relationship between the kingdom of grace and the realm of nature (including the "world"). Forwards them to help in their own actions, the action of God and his own sophistication of respect, and because of the contrast and even non-believers to give political space.
The two kingdoms doctrine thus requires the political commitment to a fundamental philosophical and ethical pluralism is not out of religious or ethical indifference, but by force and in a specific religious and ethical commitment, you can change only in critical limits, but only so reliable.

E. Herms, theology and politics - the two kingdoms doctrine as a theological program of a politics of ideological pluralism, in: E. Herms design, society - contributions to the Protestant social ethics, Tübingen 1997, p. 95-124.

calling one, the admission of plurality not as different from the Christian belief and to understand their claim to validity, but as a challenge their very own. there is much to say about the phenomenon, the classic two-kingdoms doctrine and Herms' acceptance of a monolithic and conceptually clear tangible basic Christian conviction.

the positive but Herms' incredibly precise thinking and sharp formulation, which are very stimulating. As so often before he takes the traditional concepts and missed them in his own thinking out a new face. translate

it to me I would probably by a differentiation of the incarnation itself and the conditions to speak of the incarnation (the circumstances of creation). Unfortunately that would take too long. any case, a tower that has been worth it to read again!

we're going to continue to throw sticks again. I am thinking of Mirko , Daniel F. and representing the next generation of the blogosphere the lady Zwink .

Zatch Bell - Go! Go! Mamono Fight! Cheapest Price

caveat (memo to self) survived

one or the other may have noticed it: in the last time I was packed and the philosophy ever since given away. I just love me to go into the minds of other people to let me drive it to trace them and I think they draw in new directions to be. some grabs me immediately obvious to me and impressed me. otherwise foreign to me, be-alienated me and asked me a lot off effort to understand the thinking structure.

are many paths that are followed, new for me and the links between the different places I stay hidden. many times the whole world alien to me, but I do not feel like to see on the map. I will even travel experience, even find out for yourself. and follow this wrong turns and dead ends well. you want to be romantic ... no, it has already become!

and I will also, and perhaps most of my own ideas of the theology in this unfamiliar routes rush. I will look familiar and familiar from new angles will believe my push into new systems and see if they can keep it or burst and burst. I will lock together into a dark chamber and wait and see if they stimulate each other.

and it is, for how different we speak and use language which applications we ... we are but time and again forced to talk about the same things that remain hidden from us in the language and are dressed only in the language of us in a robe. and lo and behold, add two foreign languages refer to one another and change the trim.

and yes, my guess is the subject of philosophy, as I myself am on my heart and the human. and also the one in whom I believe, Jesus. granted, it should be a reproach.

but one God forbid: that this Jesus, whom I have made the subject of my philosophy, even to Philopsophie will. thought that a building will, called by the name of a person. He is nothing less than that! one person! my opposite! the calls to answer my questions and answer questions after his! the systems can be thwarted and shattered Ringtone! the grasp is not! me doin the experience and it exceeds it by far! all this, just not a philosophy!

and this applies to the philosophical systems for no more than our traditional religious systems. because: But we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and unto the Greeks foolishness. (1 Corinthians 1:23)